Found this, very interesting read, puts a lot of facts in place and gets rid of some myths.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
A sweet Read
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by BuGSGTR Rods are fordged.....
This was discussed at length a while back.
Last edited by D323; 12-15-2005, 02:26 PM.
Comment
-
I have always wondered about that ... are the GTX rods squeeze cast as well - or are they just normall cast?
Originally posted by D323no, they are squeeze cast. You can see from the picture on the link above the casting marks on the side of the rod.
This was discussed at length a while back.
http://www.wihandyman.com/forum/show...light=GTR+rods
Comment
-
no, notice in the pic that BPT323 posted in link I gave shows the rough surface? That is from the sand in the regular casting process.
GTX < B6t < GTR
the B6t rods are just regular cast as well, but are a bit beefier than the GTX rods. They do however have a small problem with cracking when pushed.
Comment
-
I have read that the BP N/A intake was better than the GTX intake. Looking at the GTR intake you notice some obstructions that,
It was Mazda's finding that with more a more commonly used equal-length intake manifold, the tract nearest to the air entry received the least volume/pressure, and the farthest tract the most. By trial, measurement and testing, the engine team perfected a cast aluminum manifold that has intricately curved and sized "walls" between the individual tracts leading to the intake ports to equalize air volume and pressure. A bonus is that the manifold's swirl generating effect contribute to efficient combustion. The equalizer intake manifolds have shown its effectiveness in improving torque from idling to the Group-A 300-bhp-plus output level and all the way up to maximum revs.
Next question; besides the sodium filled exhaust valves is there any diffrences between the GTX and GTR heads, i.e. larger ports, different cams, etc? Again I believe I read that people were choosing the N/A BP head versus the GTX heads.2005 Mazda 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by Silentbob343I have read that the BP N/A intake was better than the GTX intake. Looking at the GTR intake you notice some obstructions that,
So perhaps the N/A BP intake isn't better than the GTX?
Next question; besides the sodium filled exhaust valves is there any diffrences between the GTX and GTR heads, i.e. larger ports, different cams, etc? Again I believe I read that people were choosing the N/A BP head versus the GTX heads.
you are correct to mention that people have posted about swapping the NA heads out on here for the better flow. After reading that, I will probably keep my GTX head, and just have it cleaned up with some port and valve work.
The person to ask would be James (limpgtx) as he was making 330whp or something like that, and he was in the process of an NA head swap when he last posted. I'd be curious to see if he has finished and gone down in power, or increased any at all.
Comment
-
Originally posted by D323no, they are squeeze cast. You can see from the picture on the link above the casting marks on the side of the rod.
This was discussed at length a while back.
http://www.wihandyman.com/forum/show...light=GTR+rods
BTW for those who don't know what Squeeze casting is:
Squeeze casting, also known as liquid metal forging, is a combination of casting and forging process.
The molten metal is poured into the bottom half of the pre-heated die. As the metal starts solidifying, the upper half closes the die and applies pressure during the solidification process. The amount of pressure thus applied is significantly less than used in forging, and parts of great detail can be produced. Coring can be used with this process to form holes and recesses. The porosity is low and the mechanical properties are improved.
Both ferrous and non-ferrous materials can be produced using this method.
Mexican: "You wanna race for titles?"
Mormon: "lol, no, I don't want your car."
Comment
Comment