If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Meh, I stand by my choice... the STI just felt like wet noodle compared to the evo when test driving...
besides... Who would want a car thats name stood for "sexually transmitted infection"
Love your car man. But I would trade in my 1.5L, 92HP pro for a car named herpes in a heartbeat my friend. Just give me the 300HP + and I would give a crap what the car is called. Ha. I can almost taste the horsepower. But I love the look of the Evo a whole lot more than that of the STI although you really cannot lose with either.
I think the evo's are teh ****, but after the problems with my dads mistu eclipse Gt, and the clutch problems I always hear about with evo's I think I'll keep my distance, but nonetheless they are bad ass.
the looks better
its faster
it doesnt cost as much
it doesnt cost as much to fix
and its faster
even the regular 8's were faster then the sti when they came out, so lets not even start talking about the evo 8 MR
theres no comparison
but im with the sanman
i'll take either of them anyday!!!
what the hell are you talking about?
they're both around $30K, the Evo might be faster in a straight line, but the STi will put up better track times. What numbers are you using to say the STi costs more to fix. Looks are totally subjective, and the Evo has no DCCD.
Comment